基于matlab的雷达天线阵列副瓣优化-切比雪夫-泰勒方向图综合

# Phased Array Antennas > The MATLAB scripts in this repo theoretically demonstrate the versatility of phased-array antennas compared to other antenna topologies (i.e. dipoles, horns, etc.). > The radiation pattern of phased-array antennas can be electronically steered and shaped, while for other antenna topologies the radiation pattern is practically fixed. ## Intro Phased-array antennas are constructed by arranging a number of individual antennas (dipoles, horns, etc.) to form an array. In the array, attenuators and phase shifters can be used to control the magnitude and phase of the signal feeding each antenna. <p align="center"> <img src=pics/dipole_phased_array_antenna.png width="300" height="300"> <img src=pics/phased_array_diagram.png width="450" height="325"> </p> <p align="center"> Dipoles forming a linear Phased-Array Antenna (1st) and complete circuit diagram (2nd) </p> ### Radiation Pattern #### Single Antenna Topologies Given the voltage and current distributions present in an antenna when energized, the corresponding E-field and H-field can be calculated. Consequently the radiation pattern can be found from the time-average Poynting Vector: <p align="center"> <img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math=S_{av} = \frac{1}{2} \mathbb{R} [\tilde{E} \times \tilde{H^*} ]"> </p> Using a software like MATLAB's Antenna Designer app, we obtain the radiation patterns of a dipole, a horn and helix antenna: <p align="center"> <img src=pics/dipole_radiation.png> </p> <p align="center"> Voltage and current distributions, 2D and 3D radiation pattern of dipole antenna </p> <p align="center"> <img src=pics/helix_horn_radiation.png> </p> <p align="center"> 3D and 2D radiation pattern of helix and horn antennas </p> As shown, for each antenna there is a corresponding radiation pattern associated with it. The dipole antenna has its characteristic omnidirectional pattern while the helix and horn have a *pointier* pattern with higher directivity at boresight. Very little can be done to change the radiation pattern of these antennas, a constraint that is present for every antenna used singularly. Phased-array antennas can alleviate this constraint and provide versatility in the radiation pattern. #### Array antennas ###### How it works - wave interference The physical principle behind a versatile radiation pattern is **wave interference**. The interference phenomena in waves was discovered a long time ago and is no novel concept in the field. However, as with many other fields in engineering, the recent advances in mixed-signal hardware and novel digital signal processing (DSP) algorithms have allowed for the cost effective closed-loop implementation of phased-array antennas. Without these improvements the implementation of phased-array antennas was limited to complex and mostly analog systems such as the AN/FPS-85 Phased Array Radar facility in Florida. Recall from the double slit experiment that due to constructive and destructive interference of waves, the resulting wave intensity pattern of two isotropic wave sources resembles the amplitude of a *sinc* function. <p align="center"> <img src=pics/wave_interferance.png width="500" height="400"> </p> <p align="center"> Double-slit experiment illustrating the interference phenomena </p> <p> Exploiting this concept with antennas and applying the pattern multiplication principle, we can theoretically analyze the performance of any array with the <i>Array Pattern</i> (F_a or AF), and treating the antennas as isotropic. Multiplying the <i>Element Pattern</i>, F_e (shown above for dipoles, helix and horn antennas) at the end results in the total radiation pattern. </p> ## Phased-Array Antennas For an antenna array with uniform amplitude weights and no phase differences between neighbouring elements, the resultant radiation pattern is the magnitude of a *sinc* function, shown in polar coordinates below: <p align="center"> <img src=pics/RadPatternPolar.png> </p> <p align="center"> Main lobe at boresight and first side lobes at -13 dB. </p> ### Steering IC phase shifters or true-time delay circuits can be used to control the relative phase of each antenna with respect to its neighbours. With the idea of wave interference in mind, we can visualize how controlling the relative phase of the antennas can result in steering the main beam to a desired direction. <!-- <figure class="video_container"> <video controls="true" allowfullscreen="true" poster="pics/Steered -45deg Polar.png"> <source src="pics/Steering Beam Polar.mp4" type="video/mp4"> </figure> --> <p align="center"> <img src=pics/BeamSteeringPolar_gif.gif> </p> The ability to electronically steer an array is quite desirable as it eliminates the need to mechanically steer an antenna to change its beam's direction. In addition, electronic steering allows beam scanning at very fast rates. ### Shaping Steering can be achieved with phase-shifters, but the shape remained practically the same. Here we show how controlling the amplitude weights of the antenna elements can result in changes in the shape of the radiation pattern. ##### Uniform Weights As mentioned above, the radiation pattern shown assumed a uniform weight distribution on all the antennas: <p align="center"> <img src=pics/RadPatternPolar.png width="375" height="280"> <img src=pics/UniformWeighting.png width="375" height="280"> </p> <p align="center"> Radiation pattern in polar coordinates from a uniform weight distribution </p> ##### Hanning Distribution If instead of a uniform weight distribution, we apply a Hanning distribution following the equation, <p align="center"> <img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math=A_{n} = \frac{1}{2} \Bigg( 1 - cos\bigg(2\pi \frac{n}{N-1} \bigg) \Bigg)"> </p> <p align="center"> <img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math=for \hspace{0.25cm} n = 1,2,...,N"> </p> the antennas in the center of the array would receive stronger signals than the antennas at the edges. We can predict a pattern with a *pointier* profile, as shown. <p align="center"> <img src=pics/RadPatternHanningPolar.png width="375" height="280"> <img src=pics/HanningWeight.png width="375" height="280"> </p> <p align="center"> Radiation pattern in polar coordinates from a Hanning weight distribution. </p> Applying a Hanning weight distribution will provide a much higher directivity and the power dissipated in the side lobes will be significantly reduced. ##### Taylor Function Implementing the Hanning weight distribution, however, is not easily realizable. Instead, a taylor distribution function is commonly used. This DSP algorithm can be accessed via multiple sources. In MATLAB, the function `taylorwin(N, nbar, sll)` returns a weight distribution for `N` elements, `sll`, the desired dB level of nearest sidelobes, and `nbar` the number of nearest side lobs with the sll value. <p align="center"> <img src=pics/RadPatternTayPolar.png width="375" height="240"> <img src=pics/TaylorWeights.png width="375" height="280"> </p> <p align="center"> Radiation pattern in polar coordinates from the Taylor weight distribution, <code>taylorwin(32, 6, -40)</code> </p> With a similar weight distribution as with the Hanning function, the shape of the radiation pattern has a slightly different profile, but the same desired characteristic: lower side lobe levels. ##### Comparison Comparing the three weight distributions, we see the differences in the radiation patterns and the main beamwidth. Depending on the constraints of the application, the widening of the beamwidth might need to be considered as a design parameter. In either case, controlling the weights of the signals feeding the individual antennas can provide a variety of desired radiation patterns depending on the application. <p align="center"> <img src=pics/ComparisonPattern.png width="375" height="280