Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0010

Case T-10/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 September 2008 — FVB v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FVB — Earlier national word mark FVD — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

OJ C 285, 8.11.2008, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.11.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/38


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 September 2008 — FVB v OHIM

(Case T-10/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark FVB - Earlier national word mark FVD - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 285/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH (Osnabrück, Germany) (represented by: P. Koehler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vermögensberatung Deutschland mbH, formerly FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vorsorgemanagement Deutschland mbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented: first by J. Mattes and P. Heigl, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2006 (Case R 1343/2005-4), relating to opposition proceedings between FVD Gesellschaft für Finanzplanung und Vorsorgemanagement Deutschland mbH and FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders FVB Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Versorgungsberatung mbH to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.


Top