This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CB0105
Case C-105/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron — Greece) — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Powers and obligations of the national court — Order for payment procedure — Granting of the application to have that order set aside — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-105/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron — Greece) — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Powers and obligations of the national court — Order for payment procedure — Granting of the application to have that order set aside — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-105/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron — Greece) — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Powers and obligations of the national court — Order for payment procedure — Granting of the application to have that order set aside — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 288, 26.8.2019, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.8.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 288/11 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron — Greece) — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE
(Case C-105/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - Powers and obligations of the national court - Order for payment procedure - Granting of the application to have that order set aside - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 288/13)
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Monomeles Protodikeio Serron
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: WP
Defendant: Trapeza Peiraios AE
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron (Court of First Instance (single judge) of Serres, Greece), by decision of 11 January 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.