This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0291
Case T-291/21: Action brought on 25 May 2021 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission
Case T-291/21: Action brought on 25 May 2021 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission
Case T-291/21: Action brought on 25 May 2021 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission
OJ C 289, 19.7.2021, p. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.7.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 289/41 |
Action brought on 25 May 2021 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission
(Case T-291/21)
(2021/C 289/58)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (Hong-Kong, China) (represented by: M. Rees and E. Estellon, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
Pursuant to Articles 268 and 340 TFEU, order the European Union (represented by the European Commission) to pay:
|
— |
Pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul the contested decision; |
— |
Order the European Commission to pay the entirety of the Applicant’s costs of the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action for damages, the applicant relies on a single plea in law. The applicant alleges that the European Union is liable pursuant to Articles 266, 268 and 340 TFEU to pay non-contractual damages to the applicant amounting to default interest for the reference period.
In support of its action for annulment, the applicant relies on four pleas in law
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the Court shall annul the contested decision as its basis for rejecting the application as time-barred constitutes an error in law. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Commission Regulation No 2342/2002 (1) interpreted in accordance with Article 266 TFEU. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Delegated Regulation No 1268/2012 (2) interpreted in accordance with Article 266 TFEU. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Court shall annul the contested decision (3) because it is insufficiently motivated. |
(1) Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 357, p. 1).
(2) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ 2012 L 362, p. 1).
(3) No Ares(2021)2113498 of 25 March 2021.