Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 52020AT39824(01)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 25 September 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39824(2) – Trucks – Rapporteur: Ireland 2020/C 216/05

C/2017/6467

OJ C 216, 30.6.2020, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

30.6.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/6

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 25 September 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39824(2) – Trucks –

Rapporteur: Ireland

(2020/C 216/05)

1.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

2.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 for the draft decision.

3.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the determination of the value of sales used for the calculation of the fines imposed by the draft decision.

4.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for the draft decision.

5.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines for the draft decision.

6.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating circumstances applicable to the infringement.

7.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no mitigating circumstances applicable to the infringement.

8.   

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the draft decision.

9.   

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Top