Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 403
Results 1 - 10 of 403.
Search took: 0.024 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
Johnson, Shirley J.; Ehinger, Michael
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2010
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2010
AbstractAbstract
[en] This paper will address the lessons learned during the implementation of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) which are relevant to the issue of 'safeguards by design'. However, those lessons are a result of a cumulative history of international safeguards experiences starting with the West Valley reprocessing plant in 1969, continuing with the Barnwell plant, and then with the implementation of international safeguards at WAK in Germany and TRP in Japan. The design and implementation of safeguards at RRP in Japan is the latest and most challenging that the IAEA has faced. This paper will discuss the work leading up to the development of a safeguards approach, the design and operating features that were introduced to improve or aid in implementing the safeguards approach, and the resulting recommendations for future facilities. It will provide an overview of how 'safeguardability' was introduced into RRP.
Primary Subject
Source
7 Aug 2010; vp; NN4003010; AC05-76RL01830; Available from http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19626.pdf; PURL: http://222.178.203.72:19005/whst/63/=vvvznrshzfnu//servlets/purl/1004539-ePhVBo/; doi 10.2172/1004539
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
Sugiyama, Hiroshi; Ishihara, Noriyuki; Maki, Akira
Proceedings of GLOBAL 2007 conference on advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems2007
Proceedings of GLOBAL 2007 conference on advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems2007
AbstractAbstract
[en] JNFL have been conducting Active Test with spent fuels at Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP). In Active Test, the evaluation of radioactivity release to the environment (atmosphere and sea) was obtained. (authors)
Primary Subject
Source
American Nuclear Society, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60526 (United States); 1873 p; ISBN 0-89448-055-3; ; 2007; p. 624-627; Advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems (GLOBAL 2007); Boise - Idaho (United States); 9-13 Sep 2007; Country of input: France; 2 refs.
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Iwamoto, T.; Ebata, T.; Fujimaki, K.; Ai, H.
Addressing verification challenges. Proceedings of an international safeguards symposium. Contributed papers2007
Addressing verification challenges. Proceedings of an international safeguards symposium. Contributed papers2007
AbstractAbstract
[en] The IAEA has never before been experienced with designing a credible safeguards approach for a large scale reprocessing plant. The safeguards discussion was initiated in 1988, but at that time no available model or guideline that could be used as a reference. The IAEA, the State and JNFL have studied and discussed the safeguards approach and safeguards system, and established effective, efficient and credible safeguards for RRP, under extensive cooperation manner. This paper presents overview of the safeguards system at RRP from the operator's viewpoint. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
International Atomic Energy Agency, Department of Safeguards, Division of Concepts and Planning, Section for System Studies, Vienna (Austria); Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (United States); European Safeguards Research and Development Association, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex (France); 888 p; ISBN 978-92-0-104707-6; ; Aug 2007; p. 729-737; International safeguards symposium on addressing verification challenges; Vienna (Austria); 16-20 Oct 2006; IAEA-CN--148/109; ISSN 0074-1884; ; Available on-line: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P1298/P1298_Contributed_Papers.pdf and on 1 CD-ROM attached to the printed STI/PUB/1298; 5 refs, 3 figs, 1 tab
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
Okude, G.; Okunoya, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Niitsu, Y.; Suzuki, K., E-mail: genki.okude@jnfl.co.jp, E-mail: yoshinobu.niitsu@jnfl.co.jp
PBNC 2014 : 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference; 38th Annual Student Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society and Canadian Nuclear Association2014
PBNC 2014 : 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference; 38th Annual Student Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society and Canadian Nuclear Association2014
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Analysis Facility of Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) has a unit which recovers plutonium from the analytical liquid wastes. From September 2012 to May 2013, we operated 11 batches with this 'Plutonium Extraction Unit'. The operations were successfully completed although the concentration of analytical reagents like sulphate ion in the analytical liquid wastes was higher than design. In this paper, we evaluate and describe the result of the operations. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Ontario (Canada); Canadian Nuclear Association, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada); Natural Resources Canada (Canada); International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria); 270 Megabytes; ISBN 978-1-926773-16-2; ; 2014; [7 p.]; 19. Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference; Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada); 24-28 Aug 2014; 38. Annual Student Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society and Canadian Nuclear Association; Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada); 24-28 Aug 2014; Available from the Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Ontario (Canada); Paper PBNC2014-014. 2 refs., 4 figs.
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Zahradnik-Gueizelar, P.; Kuhn, E.; Johnson, S.; Duhamel, G.; Radecki, Z.; Kuno, Y.
Addressing verification challenges. Proceedings of an international safeguards symposium. Contributed papers2007
Addressing verification challenges. Proceedings of an international safeguards symposium. Contributed papers2007
AbstractAbstract
[en] The On-Site Laboratory (OSL) is committed to providing the IAEA with reliable, accurate and timely results of the inspection samples taken at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP). The OSL is an important part of the efforts to safeguard adequately this large reprocessing plant. It is located on the premises of the RRP, which helps to resolve the timeliness dilemma. The OSL is operated jointly by the IAEA, the Nuclear Material Control Center (NMCC) and Japan Safeguards Office (JSGO). This joint task requires addressing new challenges in destructive analysis (DA) and the sharing of instruments, space and procedures in order to reach the best analytical results possible. The inspector-analysts make great efforts to achieve excellence in the sample chemistry and to ensure that the procedures and results are adequately authenticated. Because the instruments are jointly used, new approaches for the implementation of measures for authentication and continuity of knowledge have been designed and put into practice. The authentication measures include securing the instruments and the data produced. Additionally, special attention is given to maintaining continuity of knowledge of the samples that undergo chemical analyses, securing the procedures and considering measures of deterrence. All these measures build a relatively solid framework for independent DA. It must be understood that a 100% assurance for a tamper-free operation is a great challenge, and the IAEA aims to achieve the best authentication under the given situation. The implementation of authentication in the routine sample chemistry requires additional efforts on the part of the IAEA and has an impact on the time needed to perform the work, compared to the activities of a normal nuclear laboratory. This paper describes the authentication policy in the OSL, the specific measures implemented and the range of confidence expected in different procedures. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
International Atomic Energy Agency, Department of Safeguards, Division of Concepts and Planning, Section for System Studies, Vienna (Austria); Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (United States); European Safeguards Research and Development Association, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex (France); 888 p; ISBN 978-92-0-104707-6; ; Aug 2007; p. 681-688; International safeguards symposium on addressing verification challenges; Vienna (Austria); 16-20 Oct 2006; IAEA-CN--148/105; ISSN 0074-1884; ; Available on-line: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P1298/P1298_Contributed_Papers.pdf and on 1 CD-ROM attached to the printed STI/PUB/1298; 7 refs, 2 figs
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
Yamamoto, Yoshiro; Tanaka, Satoshi; Kawabe, Shuji; Kamada, Yoshiaki
Proceedings of GLOBAL 2007 conference on advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems2007
Proceedings of GLOBAL 2007 conference on advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems2007
AbstractAbstract
[en] During the first step, the second and the third step of Active Test (AT) at Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP), the performances of the Head-end Facility were checked, mainly for shearing and dissolution: shearing force and shearing time were the values as expected and concentration of U and Pu in dissolution solution were the values as expected. And safety requirement for acidity in dissolution solution was satisfied. (authors)
Primary Subject
Source
American Nuclear Society, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60526 (United States); 1873 p; ISBN 0-89448-055-3; ; 2007; p. 227-233; Advanced nuclear fuel cycles and systems (GLOBAL 2007); Boise - Idaho (United States); 9-13 Sep 2007; Country of input: France; 1 ref.
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Itahara, K.; Satou, H.; Negishi, Y.; Tochigi, T.; Kumanomido, H.; Odanaka, S.; Saitoh, S.; Kurosaki, M.
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety - ICNC 20112011
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety - ICNC 20112011
AbstractAbstract
[en] Burnup credit is taken in criticality safety control at the Spent Fuel Storage Facility (SFSF) and at the Fuel Dissolution Facility in the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant. Spent fuel burnup value is measured using a burnup monitor at the SFSF. Storage rack types are selected with U235 residual enrichment derived from initial enrichment and measured average burnup value. At the Fuel Dissolution Facility, the necessity of neutron absorbers for nitrate solutions are judged based on initial enrichment and top 50 cm average burnup values. The burnup monitor was calibrated against operator declared burnup values through measurements of 100 spent fuel assemblies. The monitor has measured about 10 thousands spent fuel assemblies during these 10 years and operation is steady. The burnup monitor consists of two Ge detectors for gamma spectrometry, four fission counters for passive neutron counting and twenty ion chambers for relative burnup profile measurement on each opposite side of an assembly. The burnup monitor has under water driving units for fuel elevation, centering fuel position and setting fission counters on the surface of the fuel assembly. Presently, an improved type of burnup monitor is being developed for the purpose of reducing waste and exposure during maintenance work. The improved equipment has a few ion chambers at the top region only. They measure the axial profile of gross gamma-ray intensity while inserting an assembly into the equipment. The fuel elevating driver will be reduced. Fission counter driving units serve as fuel centering guides. The fuel scanning system determines effective fuel regions using depressions that appear at the position of spacers or grids in a measured profile. Thus, average burnup measurement is performed independently from the information relating to the position of the fuel handling machine. Moreover, some additional self diagnostic functions will be applied for gross gamma-ray scanning measurement. This includes for example, the checking of signal noise and fuel swinging during measurements. (authors)
Primary Subject
Source
UK Working Party on Criticality - WPC (United Kingdom); OECD Nuclear Energy Agency - NEA, Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA)); 1726 p; Sep 2011; 8 p; ICNC 2011: International conference on nuclear criticality; Edinburgh (United Kingdom); 19-22 Sep 2011; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses; Country of input: France; 4 refs.
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Full text: Accurate determinations of volume are a fundamental component of the accountancy of nuclear material (NM) in a facility that processes such material in liquid form. In the Rokkasho-mura Reprocessing Plant (RRP), the inlet accountancy is performed in a tank (IAT) that has been initially calibrated during the cold tests in 2002. To ensure that the calibration curve V = f(H) is remaining valid during the whole life of the plant, the operator performs a specific test once a year during a long time shutdown. This test consists in pouring known amounts of water in the tank and measuring the resulting height of liquid with the dip tubes (fast bubbling rate). The IAEA is measuring independently the levels and densities in the tank using its own manometers, part of the SMMS-1 system. The temperature and mass values are operators data. During the test, inspectors randomly survey the data collected by the operator. Samples are taken in the tank before and after calibration, and also in the feeding tank. These samples are independently measured in the OSL. In order to limit the errors, the procedure and conditions of the calibration check are very close to the ones of the initial calibration. Yet some differences cannot be avoided, such as the presence of the heel in the bottom in the tank, the presence of a hydraulic seal on the feeding line, the operation of the ventilation off gas system, the use of humidified bubbling air, and so on. The evaluation of the calibration check results by the IAEA must take into account all the possible errors or biases in order to detect any significant change in the way volumes are measured in this tank. Many technical issues are discussed internally (SGOA2, PSA) and with the operator during technical meetings. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
International Atomic Energy Agency, Section for System Studies, Division of Concepts and Planning, Department of Safeguards, Vienna (Austria); Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (United States); European Safeguards Research and Development Association, Ispra, VA (Italy); 386 p; 2006; p. 196; Symposium on international safeguards: Addressing verification challenges; Vienna (Austria); 16-20 Oct 2006; IAEA-CN--148/198
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Senzaki, Masao; Inoue, Naoko; Kuno, Yusuke; Seya, Michio
Proceedings of the GLOBAL 2009 congress - The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives2009
Proceedings of the GLOBAL 2009 congress - The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives2009
AbstractAbstract
[en] Japan has established the commercial nuclear fuel cycle with LWR as a non-weapon state (NWS), and now has been developing FR fuel cycle as the next generation technology. The Government of Japan intended to start the discussion in 2010 on the second reprocessing plant next to Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) in the 'Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy', October 2005. 'Five Party Council' has established a working group for the preparations toward the national discussion on the second reprocessing plant, and will submit the report in December 2008. It will be the transition period from LWR cycle to FBR cycle, therefore, the reprocessing plant may be required to receive the spent fuels from both LWR and FBR. The challenges in the aspect of nuclear nonproliferation will be complex depending on what technologies will be adapted, how it will be developed, and its R and D schedule. JAEA is expected to continue being responsible on the R and D including nonproliferation technologies. The key is the close communication between the designers of the nuclear energy system and the process, and nonproliferation analysts including safeguards and proliferation resistance. In this regard, the four key areas, which are critical in order to acquire the international acceptance and are needed to work together with the designers and nonproliferation experts, are identified. They are 1) Technology that enhances proliferation resistance, 2) Advanced safeguards technology, 3) Development of proliferation resistance evaluation methodology, and 4) Nuclear security and physical protection technology. They are all needed to be developed on the international consensus basis. This paper presents 1) Japanese R and D programs for future nuclear energy system including the transition period, 2) Four key areas of nuclear nonproliferation, 3) JAEA's efforts for the establishment of international consensus. (authors)
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Societe Francaise d'Energie Nucleaire - SFEN, 5 rue des Morillons, 75015 Paris (France); 567 p; Jun 2009; p. 396; GLOBAL 2009 Congress: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives; Paris (France); 6-11 Sep 2009
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Lu Yan; Xin Pingping; Zhang Xue; Chen Yajun; Chen Sizhe
Progress report on nuclear science and technology in China (Vol.5). Proceedings of academic annual meeting of China Nuclear Society in 2017, No.9--Nuclear Information (including Computer Technology) sub-volume2018
Progress report on nuclear science and technology in China (Vol.5). Proceedings of academic annual meeting of China Nuclear Society in 2017, No.9--Nuclear Information (including Computer Technology) sub-volume2018
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant is owned and operated by Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited (JNFL). The main part ol the plant is based on AREVA process used in French reprocessing plants La Hague. The plant originally planned to put into operation in 1995, but the problems constantly emerge during construction and test phases. In January 2016, JNFL announced to change the work plan, pushing back the scheduled completion date to September 2018. The date for completion of construction and testing of the plant has been postponed for the 23 th time. This paper will review construction process of the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant, and study the experiences and lessons. (authors)
Primary Subject
Source
Chinese Nuclear Society, Beijing (China); 163 p; ISBN 978-7-5022-8776-4; ; Apr 2018; p. 72-77; 2017 academic annual meeting of China Nuclear Society; Weihai (China); 16-18 Oct 2017; 3 figs., 1 tab., 15 refs.
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |