Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 11430
Results 1 - 10 of 11430.
Search took: 0.044 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Original Title
Uebungen zu fiktiven Vertragsverstoessen am nationalen Datenzentrum zur CTBT-Verifikation
Primary Subject
Source
76. annual conference of the DPG and DPG Spring meeting 2012 of the condensed matter section (SKM) with further DPG divisions environmental physics, microprobes, radiation and medical physics, as well as the DPG working groups energy, equal opportunities, industry and business, information, philosophy of physics, physics and disarmament, young DPG; Berlin (Germany); 25-30 Mar 2012; Available from http://www.dpg-verhandlungen.de; Session: AGA 4.4 Fr 11:30; Also available as printed version: Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft v. 47(4)
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft; ISSN 0420-0195; ; CODEN VDPEAZ; (Berlin 2012 issue); [1 p.]
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
AbstractAbstract
[en] The prevention of illicit transport of nuclear and radioactive material across borders is part of nuclear non-proliferation measures and important in prohibiting terrorist acts. In the context of the TACIS (Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States) program of the European Commission, the Fraunhofer INT leads a consortium working on a project concerning the monitoring of vehicles and pedestrians at Ukrainian border stations by means of radiation detection systems. Several Ukrainian border crossing stations to the EU were assessed, also by Fraunhofer INT scientists, concerning the necessities and options for installing such equipment. Various aspects were taken into consideration, e.g. the station's general layout, the traffic flow, and detection systems already present. The course and the preliminary results of the project are presented.
Primary Subject
Source
76. annual conference of the DPG and DPG Spring meeting 2012 of the condensed matter section (SKM) with further DPG divisions environmental physics, microprobes, radiation and medical physics, as well as the DPG working groups energy, equal opportunities, industry and business, information, philosophy of physics, physics and disarmament, young DPG; Berlin (Germany); 25-30 Mar 2012; Available from http://www.dpg-verhandlungen.de; Session: AGA 3.5 Do 18:00; No further information available; Also available as printed version: Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft v. 47(4)
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft; ISSN 0420-0195; ; CODEN VDPEAZ; (Berlin 2012 issue); [1 p.]
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
Kimura, Yoshiki; Sakurai, Satoshi; Sato, Kaneaki; Toda, Nobufumi; Shinoda, Yoshiharu; Okubo, Ayako; Magara, Masaaki; Watahiki, Masaru; Kuno, Yusuke
Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of INMM Japan Chapter2012
Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of INMM Japan Chapter2012
AbstractAbstract
[en] The national statement made by the Japan Government at 2010 Nuclear Security Summit (Washington D.C., U.S.A.) was to develop its nuclear forensics detection and analysis technologies in a three-year period and to share them with the international community to contribute to strengthening the nuclear security regime. The Japan Atomic Energy Agency, the organization that possesses analytical capabilities with the potential to fulfill this nuclear forensics mission, started R and D on nuclear forensics technology from JFY 2011. The main areas of development are isotopic ratio analysis, impurity analysis, uranium age determination, etc. The cooperation with US-DOE and EC-JRC were also started to effectively promote the technical development. In the presentation reported will be progress in R and D to establish nuclear forensics analytical capabilities and international cooperation. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Japan Chapter, Tokyo (Japan); [271 p.]; 2012; [8 p.]; 33. annual meeting of INMM Japan Chapter; Tokyo (Japan); 25-26 Nov 2012; Available from Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Japan Chapter, 1-28-9 Higashi-Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 110-0015 Japan; Available as CD-ROM Data in PDF format, Folder Name: pdf; Paper ID: dis3322.pdf; 4 figs.
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Fixed radiation portal monitors (RPMs) deployed at border, seaport, airport and key traffic checkpoints have played an important role in preventing the illicit trafficking and transport of nuclear and radioactive materials. However, the RPM is usually large and heavy and can't easily be moved to different locations. These reasons motivate us to develop a mobile radiation detection system. The objective of this paper is to report our experience on developing the mobile radiation detection system for search and detection of nuclear and radioactive materials during road transport. Field tests to characterize the developed detection system were performed at various speeds and distances between the radioactive isotope (RI) transporting car and the measurement car. Results of measurements and detection limits of our system are described in this paper. The mobile radiation detection system developed should contribute to defending public's health and safety and the environment against nuclear and radiological terrorism by detecting nuclear or radioactive material hidden illegally in a vehicle
Primary Subject
Source
7 refs, 6 figs, 1 tab
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Radiation Protection; ISSN 0253-4231; ; v. 35(4); p. 167-171
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] In June 2000, during records reconciliation and verification of the spent fuel pool inventory, the licensee for a nuclear power plant identified that two full-length irradiated fuel rods, which had been separated from their parent assemblies and placed in a container for individual rods in the spent fuel pool, were not in the location specified in the nuclear material accounting records. The licensee conducted an extensive investigation, which concluded that the missing fuel rods had very likely been transported to a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility. The State’s SRA conducted an inspection that reviewed the results of the licensee’s investigation and concurred with the licensee’s conclusions regarding the location of the two rods. The licensee was cited for failure to control and account for the two rod segments, and was issued a Severity Level II violation with a monetary penalty
Primary Subject
Source
International Atomic Energy Agency, Strategic Planning and External Coordinaton Section, Vienna (Austria); 130 p; Feb 2015; p. 79-81; ISSN 1816-9309; ; Also available on-line: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/SVS-31_web.pdf; Enquiries should be addressed to IAEA, Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section, E-mail: sales.publications@iaea.org; Web site: http://www.iaea.org/books
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
AbstractAbstract
[en] The assessment of nuclear material quantities located in nuclear plants requires knowledge of additions and subtractions of amounts of different types of materials. Most generally, the quantity of nuclear material held is deduced from 3 parameters: a mass (or a volume of product); a concentration of nuclear material in the product considered; and an isotopic composition. Global uncertainties associated with nuclear material quantities depend upon the confidence level of results obtained in the measurement of every different parameter. Uncertainties are generally estimated by considering five influencing parameters (ISHIKAWA’s rule): the material itself; the measurement system; the applied method; the environmental conditions; and the operator. A good practice guide, to be used to deal with weighing errors and problems encountered, is presented in the paper.
Primary Subject
Source
Available from https://esarda.jrc.ec.europa.eu/images//Bulletin/Files/B_2011_046.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
ESARDA Bulletin; ISSN 0392-3029; ; v. 46; p. 49-56
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Reprocessing plants require continuous and integrated safeguards activities by inspectors of the IAEA and Euratom because of their proliferation-sensitivity as complex facilities handling large quantities of direct use nuclear material. In support of both organizations, the JRC has developed a solution monitoring software package (DAI, Data Analysis and Interpretation) which has been implemented in the main commercial European reprocessing plants and which allows enhanced monitoring of nuclear materials in the processed solutions. This tool treats data acquired from different sensor types (e.g. from pressure transducers monitoring the solution levels in tanks). Collected signals are often noisy because of the instrumentation itself and/or because of ambient and operational conditions (e.g. pumps, ventilation systems or electromagnetic interferences) and therefore require filtering. Filtering means reduction of information and has to be applied correctly to avoid misinterpretation of the process steps. This paper describes the study of some filters one of which is the centered moving median which has been revealed as a powerful tool for solution monitoring.
Primary Subject
Source
Available from https://esarda.jrc.ec.europa.eu/images//Bulletin/Files/B_2012_047.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
ESARDA Bulletin; ISSN 0392-3029; ; v. 47; p. 33-40
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Rathkolb, O.; Roehrlich, E.
University of Vienna (Austria)2012
University of Vienna (Austria)2012
AbstractAbstract
[en] The aim of the conference is to gather experts on the history of the IAEA, non-proliferation and historical aspects of nuclear accidents. (kancsar)
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
2012; [vp.]; International Conference: United Atoms in a Divided World: The early history of the IAEA; Vienna (Austria); 16-18 Sep 2012; Available in abstract form only, full text entered in this record; Conference program available from http://www.univie.ac.at/zeitgeschichte/cms/uploads/17-18-09-2012IAEA.pdf
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] On-site inspection (OSI) is a critical part of the verification regime for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). The OSI verification regime provides for international inspectors to make a suite of measurements and observations on site at the location of an event of interest. The other critical component of the verification regime is the International Monitoring System (IMS), which is a globally distributed network of monitoring stations. The IMS along with technical monitoring data from CTBT member countries, as appropriate, will be used to trigger an OSI. After the decision is made to carry out an OSI, it is important for the inspectors to deploy to the field site rapidly to be able to detect short-lived phenomena such as the aftershocks that may be observable after an underground nuclear explosion. The inspectors will be on site from weeks to months and will be working with many tens of tons of equipment. Parts of the OSI regime will be tested in a field exercise in the country of Jordan late in 2014. The build-up of the OSI regime has been proceeding steadily since the CTBT was signed in 1996 and is on track to becoming a deterrent to someone considering conducting a nuclear explosion in violation of the Treaty
Primary Subject
Source
Short course on nuclear weapon issues in the 21st century; Washington, DC (United States); 2-3 Nov 2013; (c) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
AbstractAbstract
[en] America's missile defense systems are deployed at home and abroad. This includes the Groundbased Missile Defense (GMD) system in Alaska and California, the Phased Adaptive Approach in Europe (EPAA), and regional systems in the Middle East and Asia. Unfortunately these systems lack workable architectures, and many of the required elements either don't work or are missing. Major review and reconsideration is needed of all elements of these systems. GMD performance in tests has gotten worse with time, when it ought to be getting better. A lack of political support is not to blame as the DoD spends about $10 billion per year, and proposes to add about $5 billion over the next five years. Russia objects to the EPAA as a threat to its ICBM forces, and to the extensive deployment of U.S. military forces in countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic and Romania, once part of the Soviet Union. Going forward the U.S. should keep working with Russia whose cooperation will be key to diplomatic gains in the Middle East and elsewhere. Meanwhile, America's missile defenses face an enduring set of issues, especially target discrimination in the face of attacks designed to overwhelm the defenses, stage separation debris, chaff, decoys, and stealth. Dealing with target discrimination while also replacing, upgrading, or adding to the many elements of U.S. missiles defenses presents daunting budget priorities. A new look at the threat is warranted, and whether the U.S. needs to consider every nation that possesses even short-range missiles a threat to America. The proliferation of missiles of all sizes around the world is a growing problem, but expecting U.S. missile defenses to deal with all those missiles everywhere is unrealistic, and U.S. missile defenses, effective or not, are justifying more and more offensive missiles
Primary Subject
Source
Short course on nuclear weapon issues in the 21st century; Washington, DC (United States); 2-3 Nov 2013; (c) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |