LISTENER

Larry K

  • 22
  • reviews
  • 0
  • helpful votes
  • 22
  • ratings

Ironic Beauty in Dissonance

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-23-24

Likes:
1. The telling was descriptive and seemingly even-handed as compared / contrasted with an attempt to persuade.
2. The self-and-(attempt-at)-other-aware peace / tension associated with the friendship of the protagonists: Dhalia and Bashear.
3. Beauty which may be found in as-yet unresolved dissonance; it is relevant to so much I observe around me.
4. The symbol of the lemon and lemon tree.

Dislikes:
None

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Bi-directional Enrichment

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-19-24

How can I rate it anything other than 5 stars? I can’t. If you’ve contemplated reading it, it seems a reasonable inference you know what you’re getting into. And it’s a reasonable inference you already love Tolkien works. So it is with me.

What’s helpful to know? A couple of tidbits:
• It isn’t an end-to-end story. It is rather more of a compilation of related stories, most 1 chapter in length, a few 2 chapters in length.
• There are intersections with more familiar Tolkien works such as LOTR, and The Hobbit. IMO, it’s best not to expect them (they’re fewer than you might expect). Though once you experience one, I predict you’ll be delighted and want to reflect on it … to appreciate the richness it provides to both familiar and new stories.

Andy Serkus delivers a simply fantastic performance.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Thorough. Necessarily long. Seemingly balanced.

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-07-24

On the challenge of balance: Absent an intentional review of sources, manuscripts, and editorial decisions eg, inclusion / exclusion, observational and summary word choices, it would be disingenuous to suggest I can adequately assess balance. Thus “seemingly” balanced. To whit much is included that seems both favorable and less favorable or unfavorable as to the man, his character, events, outcomes, and so forth. I appreciate that “seeming” balance. Greatly.

Regarding long: Reading / listening is an investment of time. Understanding requires yet more. And comprehension yet more. I’m certain I’ve at best understood a portion of the man and the history. The investment is in the end rewarding; it is at times enjoyable or even entertaining; and it is at times tedious. Contributing ever so slightly to the tedium is the narrator’s mispronunciation of place names such as Man-tī (not Man-tē).

Thus is it thorough. It seems few stones are left unturned, rolled (made effective use of as in gathered no moss), or thrown (as seemed fitting to author / editor).

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Imprecise. Loose. Barely additive.

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-27-24

Likes:
• The title
• The distinction of the observed phenomena as compared to e.g., depression.

Dislikes:
• Hypothesis and conjecture laden.
• Short on testable and tested phenomenological relationships.
• The author’s continued disregard of the distinction between depression and languishing. This is most notable in his attempts to support his conjecture with curable research.
• Sloppy / imprecise use of language

The small amount of truly additive content (additive to literature on mental and emotional health) could be done with one blogpost.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Informative and yet Overwrought

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-24-24

Likes:
• The nod to history preceding Duterte hence some sense of characteristics of the people and context.
• Attention given to novel and less familiar word meanings eg, “salvage.”
• Generally descriptive style as contrasted with something intended to be rhetorical / persuasive. Done well, descriptive may be rather persuasive while respecting the reader’s sentience.

Dislikes:
• Could have had a similar impact (and remain sufficient to the gravity of the subject matter) in much less space / time.
• Chapters would benefit from more descriptive titles to enable a reader to select those portions most relevant to read. For example, a Philippino likely would not need historical background .

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Unmistakably Carefully Skillfully Assembled

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-22-24

Accurate history telling / writing. Philosophically and epistemologically it seems an unavoidable contradiction in terms.

Thus is a careful and sincere effort admirable and appreciated. Thus do I admire and appreciate this work by Benjamin Parker.

It seems carefully sourced and documented. And it seems to leverage and benefit greatly from access to previously unavailable sources.

Life (and human nature) is … well life (and human behavior) is messy. And delightful. And troublesome. And in some fundamental ways unchanging. And it (both) defy tidy too-oft imposed dichotomous classifications ie, good/bad, right/wrong, and so forth.

My compliments to the author whose work allows and invites understanding, sympathy, empathy, and self reflection.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Historically Thorough

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-20-24

Likes:
• The story of unfolding understanding
• The passion for understanding
• The accounts of learning by intuition, inspiration, relentless inquiry, patient pondering, communal interests / intuitions
• The science itself
• Seeming universality of the science and explication of associated conditions
• The characters so to speak tho’ very real people

Dislikes:
• Just one. I’d devote less space / time on administrative troubles eg funding and leadership. Inclusion is important but the same degree of thoroughness wasn’t as interesting / useful (to me)




Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Descriptive and Well Ordered

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-11-24

Likes:
• The thematic ordering (as opposed to strictly chronological) facilitated consumption and understanding.
• The authors’ approach was largely descriptive (ad opposed to interpretive and / or persuasive)
• It seems the primary source was extensive (thank you Claire); and it seems supplemental resources were also well researched and incorporated.
• So much insight packed into an economical package. Nicely done. Very.
• Seemingly no or low bias (is there really anything such as no bias)?
• Truth telling or perhaps rather fact and phenomenon as told by first hand witnesses.

Liked less:
• The occasional interpretive and summative remarks usually at the conclusion of a section. What is the need for or value of netting down the delightful complexity of human endeavor (even or especially in the setting religious organization)? What is the practical value or in contrast theoretical merit in assessing a net positive or net negative?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Irony Perfected

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-16-24

Delightful. Utterly. Fortunate I feel to have been introduced to Amor Towles and since then to have read most of his works. Fitzgerald, Wharton, and Hemingway were to me required readings … eye-opening and the beginning of a love of literature. I anticipate Towles will be perhaps is already such to more recent and upcoming generations.

And Lithgow’s narration is similarly superb.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Entertaining as Always (with Sandford)

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-11-24

Likes:
The Davenport(s) worlds and characters (central and supporting).
The story: timely, clever ,and distinguishable (not another COVID).
Pacing and build: believable and multiple crescendos.
Humor amidst the chaos,crisis, and drama.

Dislikes: I found the voice for Letty distracting. It felt too young to me to be consistent with a woman of her considerable experience, skill, and gravitas.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!