LISTENER

Rose

  • 323
  • reviews
  • 555
  • helpful votes
  • 326
  • ratings

a bit wimpy towards the end

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-07-24

Overall, I liked this book a lot. There are one or two issues I have with it though. Why didn’t it occur to either of the couple to wonder why, if the nanny was so good she could just drop everything to live in full-time? How come the baby carrier that had been on the table was suddenly on the chair? A bit wimpy at the end, a bit too pat and convenient but otherwise well worth a read. The narration was good, the characters well drawn but awful but that’s no crime is it?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

just one question

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 08-04-24

Don’t get me wrong, I did like the book but, one question. How did Anna manage to access Siobhan’s account? She couldn’t do a good forgery and didn’t have the pin number to use a cash machine. A bit top heavy n the ‘I said’ ‘she said’ but overall, a decent book though, it was kind of predictable.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

good for him

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-09-23

The performance lets this book down a bit, kind of childish narration at times. The book itself well, it’s certainly honest. What a low blow by Chelsea to do what they did and all those petty people suspending somebody before anything had even been proved. I get that they had a kind of duty of care but surely some negotiation about how to proceed following the various allegations wouldn’t have been such a big deal. I never believe what they say in the press anyway so i never thought of him as arrogant in the first place. A very interesting book though, all that burocratic nonsense doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

some people will read anything and find it brilliant

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-06-23

if this book proves anything it is that, some people will read anything and find it brilliant. Some people would find the label on a baked beans can interesting if the reviews for this nonsense are anything to go by and the fact that this author is apparently a best seller though how that is I can’t think. It stretches plausibility to the max and then breaks it. Souls flying around all over the place, doing their parasite bit and that’s good? it’s believable? Not to me it isn’t. Will is all over thhe place but then it’s obvious why isn’t it? So, they find a way out of their predicament and all live happily ever after. No disability, no brain damage. well, ain’t that just fine and dandy. I can’t finish this. The performance is all over the place as well. times when the narrator seems to have his hand up to his mouth or is too close to the microphone and times when it’s not too bad. As inconsistent as the book really. good plot full of poor writing and a tendency to make the incredulous sound credulous and even the author seems to think it’s rubbish what with all the excuses and holes in the plot she attempts to close with some or other unbelievable explanation. I won’t be trying another of her books that’s for sure.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

a wicked woman or not

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 30-03-23

well, if you like Kate Summerscale’s ‘the wicked boy’ you’ll like this. It’s written in similar vein and set at a similar time. there though the similarities end. Was Mary guilty or not? Did she have an accomplice or not? I guess we’ll never know. it’s a compelling read though in my opinion even if some of the pronunciations are a bit dubious. It’s well enough read despite that though, like another reviewer, I do wonder why they didn’t use a British narrator or at least direct the narrator they did choose as to pronunciations of British place names and surnames.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

welll, I finished it, that’s all

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 27-02-23

This was the most implausible irritating book I have read so far this year. I mean, a comet hovering above the earth? Not likely is it? It would fall as soon as it entered earth’s orbit being pulled by gravity although, since a comet is just a collection of gases it would most likely disintegrate not hover there suspended. then there’s words like snickered, dove (instead of dived) specialty. This is set in England is it not? So, what’s with those words? Then it’s full of ‘he said’ and ‘she said’ which is also really irritating. Beyond that well, I finished it. What more is there to add?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Home Before Night cover art

how selfish can youu get

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 21-02-23

Spoiler alert. Whatever reasons you give for your actions it is totally wrong what Lou did. Grief can make you do many unforgivable things but you really can’t like any of the main characters in this book, the adults anyway. The family we know the least about is the one you’d feel sorry for but Lou? You way. It’s a well crafted plot and all too plausible mind. If only it wasn’t so full of ‘he said’ ‘I said’ and the telephone voice during narration spoils it all though the narrators were pretty good so I don’t blame them for production decisions.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

waffle, waffle, waffle

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-01-23

This might have been a good book. It’s certainly a true story reminiscent of another similar case where kids got in the way of a good time and so the mother killed one and severely injured two others then tried to blame somebody else, somebody that didn’t even exist. This one goes in to way too much detail though. Do we really need to know that one of the key witnesses sat up in bed and looked at the clock the day Joe told her that Ellen had been arrested? I don’t think so. Then there’s a blow by blow conversation at the station which could have been cut short. That’s what’s wrong with this book. Otherwise, not too bad though I wouldn’t recommend it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

did he deserve that?

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 29-12-22

Spoiler alert. This is a difficult book to write a review on without there being spoilers so, if you don’t want to know what happens don’t read on. Did Gary deserve what happened? This is a frustrating book if only because it’s so darned predictable and yet, despite things being glaringly obvious to the reader Nicola, an intelligent woman holding down a responsible job, can’t see it. Gary os obnoxious and there’s some stereotyping in this book. Council house equates to bad person which is utterly wrong as I can testify to myself. Anyway, does anyone deserve to do time for a crime they did not commit just because money talks? Well, you be the judge of that and make no mistake about it, money talked here in the end.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

did they not need visas then?

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 17-12-22

well, there’s a enormous flaw in this whole book or there is unless I miss my guess. First of all there’s the small matter of American visas which none of the protagonists even applied for but, on the spur of the moment they flew to Chigaco some of them on fake passports and not one mention of the increased airport security that came in to place after various terrorist attacks through the decade before this book was set. How is that then? Anyone using airports will see this dreadful lack of research by an author who really ought to know better travelling herself as she does. then an evil little schmuck able to rewrite his personality to suit himself, a consummate actor with a fancy for himself which is utterly unbearable. A soppy family reunion and Libby who is not a wonderful person but shallow and utterly lacking in personality and Rachel, as loose as they come adored by her slavish father. All in all an unsavoury lot and a book badly flawed I should think. Otherwise, if more planning had gone in to it, a decent enough story with awful characters in it though I will admit, Henry and Rachel were so odious I just skipped past their parts of the story. Anyway, if you do attempt this book I hope you gain more pleasure from it than I did.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!