LISTENER

Sarah UK

  • 48
  • reviews
  • 4
  • helpful votes
  • 61
  • ratings

Really bad editing

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 14-03-25

The story had big gaps in it with no context. The author didn't expand the characters or expand the story line. What would have been a good story was very amateurish. I felt it compressed a trilogy into a short series of stories.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

loved it!

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-03-25

Bit different from Yvonne's other books and I loved it!. Well written, relatable and so engaging. Loved all the characters!. Really hope there's more like this from Yvonne.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

very churchy. Poor attempt at accents

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 22-02-25

would have been a good story but it became very churchy and the terrible attempt at Geordi and Scottish accent were cringe worthy, just sounded like a weird Indian accented language.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Great story for teens and the not so young!

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 16-02-25

great story, engaging, amusing and family friendly. Narration was spot in. thoroughly enjoyed listen to this story of Mumbai's station kids and their escapades to solve a crime.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Some of the speech was out of context for that time period

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 29-01-25

Overall the storyline was good. The narration very good but some of the style of speech was not correct for that time period. Sloppy writing.
'who all has' should be
' whom else' other inconsistent speech style was a bit annoying.
Modern speech creeping in now and then. Dialogue was very formal in the early 1800s.
Should be 'enquire' rather than 'ask'. 'What is' rather than 'what's'.


Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

screechy narrator

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 20-01-25

spoiled the overall rendition. simplistic story. obvious plot but good for the author for not making the romance side childish.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Zoe wasn't a Christian name in 18th century.

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 16-01-25

mostly a good story but for someone who has lived over 300 years the main character is a bit 'thick'. The name Zoe is of jewish origin and would not be around in Salem c1740.
Some big pronounciation blunders and far too obvious plot story lines.
For 300 Yr old person, she should be loaded with 300 years to accumulate money.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Beautifully written and narrated

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 10-01-25

loved this story from beginning to end. wish there was a sequel to find out how things turn out for Esme, Floriana and Adam.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

very poor

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 25-11-24

really poor writing. childish, badly written, wrong narrator and mispronounciations. could not listen any longer than a few chapters.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

engaging

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 14-11-24

A few mistakes for that era.
girl friends is an Americanism not used in England at that time also heroine not hero. Union flag not Union jack. Union Jack is the term for the Union flag on a ship or a term used in Australia...not used in England at that time.
.Bit predictable in places

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!