Search Options
Home Media Explainers Research & Publications Statistics Monetary Policy The €uro Payments & Markets Careers
Suggestions
Sort by

Priorities & risks

Our supervisory priorities set out the focus of our activities for the next three years. They are revisited each year to reflect changes in the risk landscape and progress made on the previous year’s priorities, and can be adjusted at any time if justified by risk developments. They guide the operational planning of supervisory activities over the medium term and ensure resources are allocated efficiently. 

The priorities are based on the key risks that supervised banks face in the current macro-financial and geopolitical environment.

Supervisory priorities 2025-2027

What are supervisory priorities?

Priority 1

Strengthen ability to withstand macro-financial and geopolitical shocks

The current environment is shaped by persistent uncertainty surrounding the macroeconomic outlook and an increasing intensity of geopolitical threats. We need to make sure banks are able to address the immediate impact of external shocks on their business, operations and risk profile.

Strengthening banks’ resilience to shocks

Key vulnerabilities

Deficiencies in credit risk management frameworks

Banks should identify any deterioration in asset quality in a timely manner and reflect this in prudent provisioning and capital levels. They should also step up their efforts to address relevant shortcomings identified by supervisors in a timely and effective manner.

Credit risk management
Deficiencies in operational resilience frameworks

Banks should comply with the legal requirements stemming from the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and step up their efforts to address previously identified shortcomings in how they manage cybersecurity and outsourcing risks.

Operational resilience frameworks

Special focus

Management of geopolitical risks

Heightened geopolitical risks require banks to reassess their strategies and operations to address mounting threats and accordingly adopt robust risk controls and mitigation plans across all risk categories.

Management of geopolitical risks

Priority 2

Remedy material shortcomings effectively

The progressive shift in focus from risk identification to risk remediation is an essential feature of the SSM-wide supervisory strategy. Banks with unresolved material shortcomings will be asked to step up their efforts to comply fully with supervisory expectations.

Timely and effective remediation of material shortcomings

Key vulnerabilities

Deficiencies in managing climate-related and environmental risks

Banks should fully comply with supervisory expectations and requirements stemming from the new EU banking package (CRR3/CRD6), and address identified shortcomings in this area in a timely manner.

Management of climate-related and environmental risks
Deficiencies in risk data aggregation and reporting

Banks should step up their efforts to remediate long-standing shortcomings and align their practices with supervisory expectations in this area. If banks fail to meet supervisory expectations, it could trigger escalation measures.

Risk data aggregation and reporting

Priority 3

Strengthen digitalisation strategies and tackle emerging challenges

Banks need to step up their digital transformation efforts to cope with increasing competition and have adequate safeguards in place to limit potential risks stemming from new business practices and technologies.

Digitalisation strategies and emerging challenges

Key vulnerabilities

Deficiencies in digital transformation strategies

Banks should strengthen their digitalisation strategies to properly mitigate the underlying risks, including risks stemming from the use of new technologies such as cloud services and artificial intelligence (AI).

Digitalisation strategies

How do we use the supervisory priorities and the risk assessment?

The SSM priorities feed into bank-specific supervisory planning, as joint supervisory teams apply a targeted risk tolerance framework that promotes effective and risk-based supervision. In this way, the priorities are also important for the following year’s Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) and they benefit from the outcome of the previous year’s SREP exercise.

Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)

Latest publications

All pages in this section

Whistleblowing