Lars Patrick BERG
Lars Patrick BERG
Germany

Date of birth : , Frankfurt/Main

9th parliamentary term Lars Patrick BERG

Political groups

  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Identity and Democracy Group - Member
  • 12-05-2021 / 22-06-2021 : Non-attached Members
  • 23-06-2021 / 15-07-2024 : European Conservatives and Reformists Group - Member of the Bureau

National parties

  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Alternative für Deutschland (Germany)
  • 12-05-2021 / 30-06-2021 : Independent (Germany)
  • 01-07-2021 / 17-01-2023 : Liberal-Conservative Refomists (Germany)
  • 18-01-2023 / 15-07-2024 : Bündnis Deutschland (Germany)

Member

  • 02-07-2019 / 15-09-2019 : Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Committee on Foreign Affairs
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Subcommittee on Human Rights
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Subcommittee on Security and Defence
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary Committees
  • 05-07-2021 / 15-12-2021 : Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
  • 13-09-2021 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with India
  • 16-12-2021 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Transport and Tourism
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

Substitute

  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee
  • 02-07-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association Committee
  • 17-09-2019 / 11-05-2021 : Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China
  • 14-09-2020 / 11-05-2021 : Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union, including Disinformation
  • 15-07-2021 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with Afghanistan
  • 14-12-2021 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Foreign Affairs
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on Foreign Affairs
  • 24-03-2022 / 18-07-2023 : Committee of Inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware

Main parliamentary activities

Contributions to plenary debates

Speeches made during the plenary session and written declarations relating to plenary debates. Rules Rule 204 and 171(11)

Reports - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for each report in the responsible committee to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

Opinions - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for an opinion to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam

05-12-2019 AFET_AD(2019)641414 PE641.414v02-00 AFET
Isabel WISELER-LIMA

OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the other part

05-12-2019 AFET_AD(2019)641417 PE641.417v02-00 AFET
Isabel WISELER-LIMA

Oral questions

Questions for oral answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union can be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s members. Rule 136

Major interpellations

Major interpellations for written answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, may be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s component Members. Rule 139, Annex III

Other parliamentary activities

Written explanations of vote

Members can submit a written explanation of their vote in plenary. Rule 194

Rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (A9-0187/2020 - József Szájer) DE

17-12-2020

Ich habe für diesen Bericht gestimmt. 2017 legte die Kommission einen Vorschlag zur Reform des EU-Komitologiesystems vor. Er zielt darauf ab, die Transparenz und Rechenschaftspflicht bei der Umsetzung von EU-Recht in bestimmten stark umstrittenen Politikbereichen durch folgende Maßnahmen zu verbessern: Änderung der Abstimmungsregeln in der letzten Phase des Komitologieverfahrens (dem sogenannten „Berufungsausschuss“), so dass nur Stimmen für oder gegen einen Rechtsakt berücksichtigt werden. Ziel ist es, den Rückgriff auf Enthaltungen und die Zahl der Fälle zu verringern, in denen der Ausschuss nicht in der Lage ist, Stellung zu nehmen, und die Kommission gezwungen ist, ohne ein klares Mandat der Mitgliedstaaten zu handeln; Einbeziehung der nationalen Minister, indem der Kommission gestattet wird, den Berufungsausschuss auf Ministerebene erneut zu befassen, wenn nationale Sachverständige nicht Stellung nehmen; Erhöhung der Abstimmungstransparenz auf der Ebene des Berufungsausschusses; und Gewährleistung eines politischen Engagements, indem der Kommission ermöglicht wird, den Ministerrat um Stellungnahme zu einer Angelegenheit zu ersuchen, wenn der Berufungsausschuss keine Stellungnahme abgeben kann. Der Bericht des Europäischen Parlaments fügt zusätzliche Kontrollebenen hinzu. Wir begrüßen eine erhöhte Transparenz bei der Ausübung der Durchführungsbefugnisse durch die Kommission.

European Citizens' Initiative - Minority Safepack (B9-0403/2020, B9-0405/2020) DE

17-12-2020

Der Schutz von sprachlichen und nationalen Minderheiten (ohne Migrationshintergrund) steht außer Frage. Die Kompetenz hierfür liegt aber alleine bei den MS.
Des Weiteren wurden die Änderungsvorschläge der ID-Fraktion nicht in den gemeinsamen Entschließungsantrag aufgenommen.
Aus diesen Gründen habe ich mich der Stimme enthalten.

A strong social Europe for Just Transitions (A9-0233/2020 - Dennis Radtke, Agnes Jongerius) DE

17-12-2020

Es handelt sich hier um einen ideologischen Bericht. Der Bericht ist ein Plädoyer für eine echte Sozialunion und Transferunion. Immer mehr Regulierung im Sozial- und Wirtschaftsbereich ist die Botschaft. Einige Beispiele: Verwandlung von SURE in ein permanentes Instrument, Unterstützung einer EU-Arbeitslosenrückversicherung, Aufforderung an die Kommission, um Richtlinien über Arbeitsbedingungen in der digitalen Wirtschaft und für die Telearbeit vorzulegen. Plädoyer für ein Verfahren zur Überwachung und Bewertung der Sozialsysteme in Europa. Plädoyer für geschlechtsneutrale Systeme in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen.
Ein starkes soziales Europa bedeutet auch für das Parlament, dass die gesetzliche Frist für einen Schwangerschaftsabbruch verlängert werden soll. Aus diesen und anderen Gründen habe ich gegen diesen Bericht gestimmt.

Written questions

Members can submit a specific number of questions to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, for written answer. Rule 138, Annex III

Militarisation of the Gulf of Aden

22-02-2024 E-000593/2024 Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Gas storage

24-01-2024 E-000227/2024 Commission

Questions to the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors

Members can submit questions to the President concerning the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors as regards their respective duties. Rule 32(2)

Questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Members can put questions for written reply to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Such questions are first submitted to the Chair of the responsible committee.Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Answers to questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Reply to members’ questions to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Individual motions for resolutions

In accordance with Rule 143 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, any individual Member may table a motion for resolution on a matter falling within the spheres of activity of the EU. These motions for resolution express the position of the individual Members who tabled them. Admissible motions are referred to the committee responsible, which shall decide whether to follow up the motion for resolution and, if so, which procedure is to be followed. Where a committee has decided to follow-up a motion for resolution, more detailed information is provided on this page, below the resolution in question. Rule 143

Declarations

All declarations below have been signed by the Member, even if the signature is not visible in the online copy.

Meetings

Meeting representatives of EAFJD

Member
BERG Lars Patrick
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Meeting with:
European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy

Meeting with Ambassador Taiwan

Member
BERG Lars Patrick
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Meeting with:
Taipei Representative Office in the European Union and Belgium

Meeting with Ambassador Somaliland

Member
BERG Lars Patrick
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Meeting with:
Somaliland Representative Office in the European Union and Belgium