Skip to main content

Displaying 1 - 20 of 9529

Evoke Wellness, LLC., FTC v.

In January 2025, the FTC sued Florida-based Evoke Wellness, LLC and Evoke Health Care Management and their officers Jonathan Mosley and James Hull for using a combination of deceptive Google search ads and telemarketing to masquerade as other substance use disorder treatment providers. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3009
Docket Number
0:25-cv-60073-MD
Case Status
Pending
Federal Register Notice

Earnings Claim Rule Regarding Multi-Level Marketing

Date
Overview When consumers consider joining a multi-level marketing program (“MLM”) to make extra income, they should be able to rely on the claims that are made about how much money they stand to make...

Intellivision, In the Matter of

Announcing settlement with IntelliVision Technologies over allegations that the company made false claims about its AI-powered facial recognition software.

FTC finalized order against IntelliVision Technologies Corp., settling allegations that the company made false, misleading, or unsubstantiated claims that its AI-powered facial recognition software was free of gender or racial bias.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
232 3023
Case Status
Pending

Facebook, Inc., In the Matter of

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated its privacy promises to consumers and subsequently violated a 2012 Commission order.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
092 3184
182 3109
C-4365

Stem Cell Institute of America, LLC

In August 2021, the FTC and the Georgia Attorney General’s Office sued the co-founders of the Stem Cell Institute of America for marketing stem cell therapy to seniors nationwide using bogus claims that it is effective in treating arthritis, joint pain, and a range of other orthopedic ailments. In January 2025 the FTC and AG’s Office announce two court orders in their favor settling the complaint and barring the company from the allegedly illegal conduct. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
182 3125
Case Status
Pending

FTC v HOPE Services

In January 2025, the FTC sent more than $49,000 in refunds to consumers who paid a sham mortgage relief operation that told financially distressed homeowners it would help get their mortgages modified, but instead effectively stole their mortgage payments.  

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
112 3136
X120014
X150052

Handy Technologies

The Federal Trade Commission, along with the New York Attorney General, are taking action against gig economy company Handy Technologies for making a broad array of deceptive claims about how much money workers on its platform could earn.

The complaint charges that Handy, which currently does business as Angi Services, has peppered its advertisements with earnings claims that don’t reflect the reality for the overwhelming majority of workers on the platform. The complaint also charges that Handy has failed to clearly disclose fees and fines that have led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers.

Under the terms of a proposed settlement order, Handy would be required to turn over $2.95 million to be used to provide refunds to harmed workers, and make substantial changes to ensure that workers give clear consent to any fees charged by the company and that the company gives workers clear direction about how to avoid fines.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending