WrikePricing

As a small company, we make it a point to squeeze every bit of value from the tools we use to run our business. While originally leveraged to assist with

I utilize it with my full digital team. I am in charge of the pre-sale side of the business - handling all new sales opportunities that come in from our

Cost Savings. Faster Time to Market. Improved Team Collaboration. Expedited Project

mandatory reviews like legal and brand review wherein only one person is in charge to conduct the review.

planning, production, sales, marketing, formulation, packaging, finance/pricing); It is helpful in creating dependencies and assigning owners. We revisit … Dependencies are challenging to use. It is not accessible to everyone (licensing fee, external partners). Adobe viewing…

implement them. The cost for Wrike is high compared to competitors. Either a lower price point or more seats/functionalities for the price I’m paying. … manage work across a large team. Easy to setup. I would recommend a less expensive price point. This has been the biggest issue with Wrike in my opinion. Compared … we reevaluate this decision every year. Asana has a…

Task management is simpler Cost effective when compared to other tools available Easy reference EOY to tasks … pieces. The learning curve is steeper than something like ClickUp; but, it is cost effective and simply takes time to develop skills in. Once you put the

Cost savings compared to Jira

account representative and the help desk. For a small team, Wrike may be cost prohibitive.

steeper learning curve. However, be not afraid, you will be getting that value in a couple of months.

we are approaching the implementation of further cost controls, this is where wrike is weakest and the controls are not easy or … on the whole works very well, it is just lacking specific scheduling and cost features more than features or capabilities being poorly…

Integrations are few, and the associated software to activate many of them is expensive and very difficult. I'd love some WYSWYG integration.

table, list, board, etc). It calculates team member hourly cost and provides real-time cost and risk management reports through built-in time tracking

request comes in, cross-tag to relevant folders depending on custom field values, and assign the right folks on any given piece of work - to name a few examples

Depends on price hikes for the platform, if they keep it affordable then we'll renew.

to view a task (to proof-read and comment) once in a while. It is too expensive for these people to have a licence, for the very few times they may need

to change the stage of certain prices should be more Easier to just click on a button than drag boxes on the screen

the ability to complete projects more efficiently has resulted in tangible cost savings for our organization. we saved time: smoother collaboration and reduced

suppliers we work with. We are able to manage the different penalties and fees that come up for each event by creating due dates and adjusting dates as

businesses. The main reason we are still using Wrike is likely due to sunk cost paradox as we spent so much time to try to use it properly… some Wrike staff

stakeholders from each department come in and make comments on catalog layouts, pricing, models, imagery, design, etc. Once a comment was made on a given page,

where there are numerous people involved in a project--someone doing intake/cost assessment for the requester, someone who develops the content, someone who

It is hard to monetize outside of the cost incurred by the tool, as a similar tool may be cheaper and provide the same output.

then routed to the proper department which notifies the person that is in charge of that specific item so they can address and fix my issue.

Ease of navigation in the holistic platform Sometimes it felt too cumbersome cost - we ended up moving to Monday.com as a company … firm but our company ultimately moved over to Monday.com last year due to pricing and seats.