Easy-to-deploy solution with a very high price tag
July 20, 2021
Easy-to-deploy solution with a very high price tag
Score 4 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Planview Projectplace
Planview Projectplace is specifically designed for Portfolio and Resource management, as opposed to only manage single projects, so it mostly makes sense if you are a company with enough programs running in parallel. It was used as part of our selection process to update our project methodology and better serve multiple customers. Because multiple offices over the world and various languages are used, as well as significant differences in project sizes, we needed to have a very simple yet effective solution to manage it all.
Pros
- It has every basic feature you'd expect from a portfolio solution
- Strong document management (tracking, security, collaboration, etc.)
- Easy drilldown and dependencies analysis across projects
Cons
- Pricing - the PPM market is saturated at a bargain price, and Projectplace does not offer anything unique
- In the end, it was too simple for us and did not fit with agile frameworks such SAFe
- Very limited API capabilities makes it difficult to integrate the tool with your technology stack, and even standard 3rd-party solutions such as Zoom took months before getting released
- Easy-to-setup with appropriate training content available online for free
- Great traceability and easy storage of documents
- No positive ROI was observed, the pricing model did not make sense at all for us
Do you think Planview ProjectPlace delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Planview ProjectPlace's feature set?
Yes
Did Planview ProjectPlace live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Planview ProjectPlace go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Planview ProjectPlace again?
No
- TargetProcess, from Apptio, Ruum by SAP, Asana, Planisware and Broadcom Clarity (formerly CA Project Portfolio Management)
The price made it impossible for us to select Projectplace as a long-term solution so it was quickly discarded. But the main issue was really the lack of support for more complex agile methodologies. We were unable to really work within a pure SAFe or Scrum framework since the solution seemed to be taking more of a waterfall approach with Kanban boards on top.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation