This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52006XX0713(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 377th meeting held on 12 July 2004 concerning a draft decision in case COMP/C.28.069 — Copper plumbing tubes
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 377th meeting held on 12 July 2004 concerning a draft decision in case COMP/C.28.069 — Copper plumbing tubes
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 377th meeting held on 12 July 2004 concerning a draft decision in case COMP/C.28.069 — Copper plumbing tubes
OJ C 162, 13.7.2006, p. 16–16
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/07/2004
- Author:
- Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
- Form:
- Opinion
- Treaty:
- Treaty establishing the European Community
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
- Subject matter:
- Directory code:
-
- 08.20.00.00 Competition policy / Restrictive practices
- 08.30.00.00 Competition policy / Dominant positions
|
13.7.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 162/16 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 377th meeting held on 12 July 2004 concerning a draft decision in case COMP/C.28.069 — Copper plumbing tubes
(2006/C 162/08)
|
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the description of the relevant products. |
|
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees that the conduct in question constitutes an infringement of Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement. |
|
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees that the infringement is a single, complex and many-sided infringement. |
|
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the duration of the infringement. |
|
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees as to the addressees of the Decision. |
|
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees as to the nature of the infringement: the infringement is very serious. |
|
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the aggravating circumstance identified by the Commission. |
|
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the mitigating circumstances allowed by the Commission. |
|
9. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's proposals regarding leniency. |
|
10. |
The Advisory Committee agrees that no undertaking can claim a reduction in the fine on the basis of its ability to pay or any other factor. |
|
11. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
|
12. |
The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the points raised during the discussion. |
