This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52017XX0614(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions meeting on 6 March 2017 concerning a draft decision relating to case AT.39258 — Airfreight — Rapporteur: Finland
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions meeting on 6 March 2017 concerning a draft decision relating to case AT.39258 — Airfreight — Rapporteur: Finland
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions meeting on 6 March 2017 concerning a draft decision relating to case AT.39258 — Airfreight — Rapporteur: Finland
OJ C 188, 14.6.2017, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.6.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 188/9 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions meeting on 6 March 2017 concerning a draft decision relating to case AT.39258 — Airfreight
Rapporteur: Finland
(2017/C 188/09)
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that it is legally possible to re-adopt a new decision in this case following the (partial) annulment of the 2010 Decision by the Court. |
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Articles 5(j) to 5(l) of the 2010 Decision are repealed and re-adopted. |
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the draft decision applies to British Airways plc in so far as the judgment of the General Court in Case T-48/11 of 16 December 2015 annulled the 2010 Decision. |
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive behaviour covered by the draft decision constitutes an agreement and/or concerted practice between undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Swiss Agreement. |
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the undertakings’ behaviour and geographic scope of the agreement and/or concerted practice contained in the draft decision. |
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertakings concerned by the draft decision participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 of the TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Swiss Agreement. |
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object of the agreement and/or concerted practice was to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Swiss Agreement. |
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreement and/or concerted practice were capable of appreciably affecting trade between the Member States of the EU. |
9. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration of the infringement. |
10. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s draft decision as regards the addressees. |
11. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
12. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
13. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
14. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines. |
15. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of the specific aggravating and mitigating circumstances in this case. |
16. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the fine for the two undertakings whose adjusted basic amount exceeds 10 % of their total turnover. |
17. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the treatment of the leniency applications and the reduction of the fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice. |
18. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
19. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |